Innovation in the Secondary Education in Spain: Future Teachers´ Recommendations and Conceptions

Maria Luisa Renau



The present paper describes the research carried out in the subject of the The University Master's Degree for Secondary Education, Vocational Training and Language Teaching at the University Jaume I (Castellón, Spain): ‘Teaching Innovation and Introduction to Educational Research’ in the specialty of Language and Literature and Language Teaching. 45 students are involved in this subject. As part of the subject´s assessment, our students are asked to work in groups in order to write a research proposal divided into two main parts: (i) theoretical background (definition of innovative teaching, main trends and authors and some examples of innovative projects), (ii) students define the innovative tool/resource they have chosen (e.g. blog, podcasts, digital books, Mahara, fakebook, etc.) and design a didactic unit using this virtual tool. In this paper, we analyse the virtual resources chosen by our students and reflect their feelings and opinions about the implementation of these new innovative materials in a real secondary school classroom. Result show that these innovative tools can help secondary school teachers to enrich and improve the teaching/learning method by supporting the traditional method but, by no means, substituting it; however not all our students think about the possibility of implementing them.

[1] Research Project: P1.1A2014-02, codi comptable 14/308


innovation, secondary education, virtual resources

Full Text:



Eugene, J. (2006). How teachers integrate technology and their beliefs about learning: Is there a connection? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 581-597.

Frigaard, A. (2002). Does the computer lab improve student performance on vocabulary, grammar, and listening comprehension? ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED476749.

Hixon, E. (2008). Team-based online course development: A case study of collaboration models. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. 11(4). Retrieved from

Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2006). Teachers‟ beliefs and practices in technology-based classrooms: A developmental view. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(2), 157–181.

Mansor, N. (2007). Collaborative learning via email discussion: Strategies for ESL writing classroom. The Internet ESL Journal, 13(3), Retrieved from

Miner, T. (2004). Using technology to enhance learning: Instructor- or Student-Moderated Discussion Boards: Which are more effective? Retrieved from

Timucin, M. (2006). Implementing CALL in the EFL context. ELT Journal, 60(3), 262-271.

Wernet , S., Olliges, R., & Delicath, T. (2000). Post course evaluation of WebCT (Web Course Tools) classes by social work students. Research on Social Work Practice, 10(4), 487-504.

Wong, L. (2004). Using technology in a low-advanced ESL class. Retrieved from

Woodrow, J. (1991). Teachers' perceptions of computer needs. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23(4), 475-49


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 International Journal of Progressive Research in Education

Copyright © 2018 International Journal of Progressive Research in Education. All rights reserved.

ISSN: 2581-4974

For any query/support contact us at,,